How quickly could a modern army conquer ancient rome?

It is impossible to know for certain how quickly a modern army could conquer ancient Rome, as there are too many variables to consider. For example, it would depend on the size and strength of the army, as well as the willingness of the ancient Romans to fight. If the ancient Romans were unwilling to put up a strong resistance, a modern army could conquer Rome relatively quickly. However, if the ancient Romans were determined to defend their city, it could take much longer for a modern army to conquer Rome.

A modern army could conquer ancient Rome quite quickly. The Roman army was no match for the grenades, guns, and tanks of a modern army. The Roman army was also not used to fighting an enemy that was able to move so quickly and strike from such a distance.

Could you destroy the entire Roman Empire with one US Marine battalion?

Goldsworthy’s argument is that the MEU would not be able to win a prolonged war against the Roman Empire, but they could cause significant damage. This could include destabilizing the empire, encouraging civil war, and causing regional fracturing. While the MEU would eventually be defeated, they could still cause significant damage and chaos in the meantime.

This is a very interesting idea, and it’s definitely possible that Special Forces Units could take out the Roman Army from within. However, it’s also possible that the Roman Army would be able to adapt and learn from their mistakes. Either way, it would be a very close and exciting battle!

Could a medieval army beat a Roman army

There are a few factors to consider when trying to determine who would win in a fight between the Medieval and Roman armies. The first is the type of fighting that would take place. If it was a hand-to-hand, face-to-face fight, the Romans would most likely win. However, if the fighting was done with long-range weapons, like the longbow, the Medieval army would have the advantage.

Another factor to consider is the size of the armies. The Roman army was much larger than the Medieval army, so even if the Medieval army had the better weapons, the Romans would still have more soldiers to fight.

Ultimately, it is hard to say who would win in a fight between these two armies. It would depend on the type of fighting that took place and the size of the armies.

The military march could be fast (iter magnum) and regular (iter iustum), about 30 km per day. This would allow the troops to cover a large distance quickly and would be ideal for moving between battlefields or when chasing an enemy.

What is the baddest Marine unit?

The War on Terror is a global conflict that is being fought by the United States and its allies against terrorist groups and organizations. The goal of the War on Terror is to protect the citizens of the United States and other countries from the threat of terrorism. The War on Terror began on September 11, 2001, when terrorist groups attacked the United States. Since then, the United States and its allies have been working to track down and eliminate terrorists and their networks. The War on Terror has been a long and difficult conflict, but the United States and its allies remain committed to its ultimate goal of protecting the world from the threat of terrorism.

A Roman soldier was a well-trained fighting machine. Soldiers were often expected to march 20 miles a day, wearing all armour and carrying equipment. After a long day, Roman soldiers had to build a camp, complete with a ditch and a wall of wooden stakes.

Who was Rome’s toughest opponent?

Hannibal Barca was a military commander from Carthage who led an army against Rome during the Second Punic War. He is best known for his daring campaigns, including his crossing of the Alps to invade Italy. Although he was eventually defeated by Rome, he remains one of the most revered military commanders in history.

The Roman legal system was quite sophisticated and strict in its procedures, especially when it came to punishment. A Roman citizen could only be beaten or chained at the orders of a Roman magistrate if they had been found guilty of a crime through a proper trial. This ensured that everyone was treated fairly and no one was unfairly punished.

How tall was the average Roman soldier

There is no definitive answer to this question as there is no reliable source that provides accurate information on the average height of a Roman soldier. However, we can make an educated guess based on available evidence. Imperial regulations state that the minimum height for a soldier was 165 cm, or 5’5″. Most scholars agree that the height of a soldier would range from about 165cm to 175cm, making the average height at around 170 cm, or 5’7″.

The Roman Army was very powerful for its time because of the quality of its training and equipment. In order to become a legionnaire, a soldier had to be able to march 20 miles in 5 hours while wearing full armour and carrying 45lbs of gear. This was a very high standard, and it made the Roman Army one of the most formidable forces of its time.

Who would win a Roman or a samurai?

In combat, a legionary will win against a samurai. The average samurai and legionary are both career soldiers that train constantly. The large shield carried by the legionary will prevent the samurai from landing a mortal blow.

The Roman army reached its largest size under the rule of Emperor Augustus. By the end of Augustus’ reign, the army numbered some 250,000 men, equally split between 25 legions and 250 units of auxiliaries. The numbers grew to a peak of about 450,000 by 211, in 33 legions and about 400 auxiliary units. The large size of the army allowed Augustus to successfully expand the Roman Empire and conquer new territories.

How far was a Roman mile

In modern times, Agrippa’s Imperial Roman mile is empirically estimated to have been around 1481 meters (1620 yards, 4860 English feet, 092 English miles); compared with a modern mile, which is 5280 feet. This difference is due to the different ways the two units of measure were defined. The Imperial Roman mile was defined as 1,000 paces, each of which was twosteps, while the modern mile is defined as 5,280 feet.

Polybius was a Greek writer and historian who lived in the 2nd century BCE. In his writing, he estimated that soldiers were paid around two obols (a type of coin) per day, which would add up to 120 denarii (another type of coin) per year. For cavalrymen, he estimated that they were paid 180 denarii per year. Obviously, the value of coins and their purchasing power was dependent on the economic circumstances of the time.

How many hours did Roman soldiers train?

The Roman mile was a standard unit of distance used in the Roman Empire. The Roman mile is equivalent to 18405 modern miles. The Roman mile was first used to measure distance in the Roman Empire. The Roman mile is still used to measure distance in the modern world.

Once a Marine, always a Marine! This expression is used to describe the enormously pride and sense of loyalty that Marines have for their fellow Marines, and for the Marine Corps as a whole. Marines are known for their steadfast commitment to the Corps, and to each other, and this expression embodies that sentiment. Marines are fiercely loyal and always ready to lend a helping hand to a fellow Marine in need.

What is the only Marine unit to surrender

The 4th Marine Regiment was a unit of the United States Marine Corps that participated in the Battle of Corregidor during World War II. The unit was ordered to surrender by Lieutenant General Jonathan Wainwright and subsequently captured by enemy forces on May 6, 1942. After this, the 4th Marines temporarily ceased to exist.

Lewis Burwell Puller, also known as Chesty Puller, was a highly decorated Marine who served in a number of conflicts including World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Puller is the most decorated Marine in American history, having been awarded five Navy Crosses and one Distinguished Service Cross.

Final Words

Assuming the ancient Romans were not expecting an attack, a modern army could probably conquer Rome fairly quickly. However, if the ancient Romans were prepared and willing to fight, it could be a much longer and bloodier battle.

Given the technological advances that exist today, it is likely that a modern army could conquer ancient Rome relatively quickly. However, there are many factors that could affect the outcome of such a conflict, including the size and strength of Rome’s army, the terrain, and the element of surprise. Ultimately, it is impossible to say for certain how long it would take for a modern army to conquer ancient Rome.

Ellen Hunter is a passionate historian who specializes in the history of Rome. She has traveled extensively throughout Europe to explore its ancient sites and monuments, seeking to uncover their hidden secrets.

Leave a Comment