{"id":9639,"date":"2023-11-07T19:50:13","date_gmt":"2023-11-07T18:50:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=9639"},"modified":"2023-11-07T19:50:13","modified_gmt":"2023-11-07T18:50:13","slug":"who-is-nero-ancient-rome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/who-is-nero-ancient-rome\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Is Nero Ancient Rome"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction to Nero Ancient Rome<\/h2>\n

The Roman Empire came to hold immense power over the Mediterranean World and beyond, but who was its leader? Nero, a powerful figure of Ancient Rome, is remembered for his substantial leadership and divided opinions amongst his peers. Reading of his reign allows an understanding of how this complex figure shaped the trajectory of the Roman Empire due to his controversial and fragmented legacy.<\/p>\n

Life and Leadership of Nero Ancient Rome<\/h2>\n

Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, commonly referred to by his later third name, was born in the year 37CD and during his life became the sixth and final Emperor of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty, ruling from the years 54 to 68CD. During his 14 year reign, Nero inspired extreme reactions from many of the people of Rome, with some feeling passionately loyal to his bold decisions and others vilifying him for his erratic outbursts and power hungry personality.
\nHaving come to the throne at the tender age of 16, Nero’s decisions were commonly characterised by a nature of impulsivity, with great examples of this seen in his grandiose building projects in Rome and his disregard for the feelings of the Roman people. Nero disregarded the advice of the Senate and acted as an oppressive leader, demanding loyalty from his people as well as aggressive taxation to fund his often frivolous policies.
\nAs a result of his autocratic attitude, Nero became associated with the idea of luxury, leisure and various scandals. His impulsive tendencies led to extravagant building projects and lives of extreme luxury, often paying little attention to the economic hardship that befell those living in his empire.<\/p>\n

Fall of Nero Ancient Rome<\/h2>\n

While Nero may have enjoyed a period of relative success and influence during his rule, this quickly changed following his ordering of the Great Fire of Rome in 64AD. While the devastation caused by this is one thing, the ill-advised rebuilding and repurposing of the area by Nero further darkened the way he was viewed by his people. The Great Fire forced Nero’s popularity to plummet and caused huge unrest in Rome due to his aggressive taxation policies and lack of care for his people.
\nThe resulting chaos in Rome drove Nero to flee the city and a coup followed. This ended his reign in 68AD and Nero committed suicide a year later in 69AD. The events of Nero’s life created upheaval in Rome, leading to a period of civil war and the end of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty.<\/p>\n

Contemporary Reception of Nero Ancient Rome<\/h2>\n

For Nero, the court of public opinion is a complex one, divided strongly between those who see his rule in Ancient Rome as violent and oppressive and those who are sympathetic to his position and the decisions he made.
\nIn the contemporary political climate, Nero is referenced by some with an anti-authoritarian sentiment. This is typified by his occasional use in the alt-right movement as a symbol of power, although this ignores the fact that his rule can in no way stand for classical liberal values.
\nModern historically inclined individual often view Nero with a nuanced lens. It is seen as important to recognise the complexity of his character and to understand the context of his decisions. While there is no way to make a concrete decision on the judgement of Nero, the consensus of modern historians is that he ought to be viewed as an average, although often unreliable, leader.<\/p>\n

Perspectives on Nero Ancient Rome<\/h2>\n