{"id":9627,"date":"2023-12-07T15:35:11","date_gmt":"2023-12-07T14:35:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=9627"},"modified":"2023-12-07T15:35:11","modified_gmt":"2023-12-07T14:35:11","slug":"who-was-responsible-for-dividing-ancient-rome-into-2-parts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/who-was-responsible-for-dividing-ancient-rome-into-2-parts\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Was Responsible For Dividing Ancient Rome Into 2 Parts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In ancient Rome, the decision to divide the empire and turn it from a republic into two separate parts occurred in 476 AD. Over time, the cause of this division has been debated and explored by many historians. The traditional narrative held by historians is that the division was caused by a succession of military leaders and political figures, who, over time, brought about the downfall of what had once been a powerful and unified empire. <\/p>\n

The traditional narrative suggests that the division was caused by the increasing presence of the Germanic tribes that invaded the Roman Empire in the 4th century. At the same time, economic and social issues were weakening the power of the Roman elite, leading to a decline in their ability to govern and protect the borders of the empire. This instability paved the way for a succession of military leaders, who sought to gain power by dividing the empire into two parts. <\/p>\n

More recently, historians have suggested that the division of Rome was the result of a political struggle between members of the Roman senate. During this period, the Senate wanted to expand its power to rival that of the Emperor and his allies, and the division allowed them to do this. Another suggestion is that the division was the result of the increasing power of local warlords who wanted more control over their territories. This would have allowed them to gain more power and wealth for themselves than if the empire had remained unified.<\/p>\n

It is difficult to pinpoint a single factor that caused the division of Rome, as there are many competing theories. Some historians believe it was a combination of factors, including political and military divisions as well as economic decline. Others argue that it was external forces such as the Germanic tribes that brought about the decline of the empire. Whatever the cause, it is clear that the division of Rome was the result of a complex combination of internal and external forces.<\/p>\n