{"id":9559,"date":"2023-11-24T04:15:22","date_gmt":"2023-11-24T03:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=9559"},"modified":"2023-11-24T04:15:22","modified_gmt":"2023-11-24T03:15:22","slug":"who-burned-ancient-rome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/who-burned-ancient-rome\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Burned Ancient Rome"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In 64 CE, Rome was struck by disaster. The deadly fires that swept through the ancient city over the course of five days destroyed a reported three-quarters of Rome, leaving a path of destruction in its wake. It is estimated that at least 10,000 people died as a result of the fire, and the city suffered a sudden, catastrophic loss of faith in its ability to provide peace and safety for its people. Ever since, the burning of ancient Rome has been a topic of fascination, with historians and archaeologists examining the cause and aftermath of the cataclysmic event. <\/p>\n

To this day, the precise cause of the great fire is still unknown. Some historians believe that an act of arson may have been to blame, with the flames originating in the shops of merchants near the Circus Maximus. Others theorise that the blaze may have been the result of a lightning strike, or a spark from a hot air ballon, while others suggest that the fire was started by the Romans themselves in a deliberate act of arson in order to invade the city’s Jewish district. Nevertheless, the precise cause of the fires remains a mystery.<\/p>\n

The most widely accepted theory is that the fire was started by the Emperor Nero himself. It is believed that Nero sought to clear away the disorganized and overcrowded areas of the city in order to rebuild them in his own image. In fact, it is believed that Nero made a dramatic and theatrical public display of his feigned distress at the fire, and took the opportunity to rebuild large portions of the city in a style more to his liking. Regardless of the cause, the Great Fire of Rome had an enormous impact on the city and its people.<\/p>\n

At the time, the Roman Empire was already in a state of turmoil. Economic instability, political unrest and a rise in crime had all contributed to a general discontent among the citizens. The fire exacerbated these pre-existing tensions, as it destroyed homes and businesses, forcing many of Rome’s citizens into poverty and exile. In addition, the fire led to an increase in anti-imperial sentiment, as many were suspicious that the emperor had a hand in starting the blaze.<\/p>\n