{"id":9112,"date":"2023-10-17T01:50:12","date_gmt":"2023-10-17T00:50:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=9112"},"modified":"2023-10-17T01:50:12","modified_gmt":"2023-10-17T00:50:12","slug":"what-percent-of-society-were-slaves-in-ancient-rome-90","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/what-percent-of-society-were-slaves-in-ancient-rome-90\/","title":{"rendered":"What Percent Of Society Were Slaves In Ancient Rome 90"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

During the peak of the Roman Empire, the population would reach an estimated 60 million. Out of that population, the extent of slave labor is unknown but is speculated to have been around 10%. This is an unprecedented amount of people belonging to other human beings and it did not go unnoticed by historical historians.<\/p>\n

Magerius, a former Roman senator, wrote about the substantial dependency of the economy on slaves in one of his famous letters. He notes that 40% of the population were slaves and that it was a way for citizens to generate income. This not only points to the sheer size of the slave population, but also the reliance of it by the citizens. This suggests that the percentage of slaves was certainly higher than what is often assumed.<\/p>\n

The reliance of Roman citizens on slaves was so great that a slave-based economy even enabled many of them to lead a higher standard of living. Slaves served as a form of currency for the upper classes, with their value often determining their duties. This could mean that their wealth and importance were mainly calculated by their slaves rather than any tangible goods.<\/p>\n

The dependence of the Roman citizens on slaves was not the same in all parts of the Empire. Wealthy regions such as Latium saw a higher percentage of slave population than other parts of Rome, perhaps indicating the degree of imbalance in terms of wealth distribution.<\/p>\n