{"id":9091,"date":"2023-10-21T17:10:12","date_gmt":"2023-10-21T16:10:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=9091"},"modified":"2023-10-21T17:10:12","modified_gmt":"2023-10-21T16:10:12","slug":"why-was-political-assassination-so-prevalent-ancient-rome","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/why-was-political-assassination-so-prevalent-ancient-rome\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Was Political Assassination So Prevalent Ancient Rome"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The practice of political assassination has been carried out throughout much of the world, in a variety of different cultures, throughout history. It is not unique to the Roman Empire, however, it is in Rome that it became particularly prevalent. In order to understand why this is so, we must look at the political and social organisation of Rome during this period and how assassination was used as a direct or indirect political tool by politicians, members of the public and indeed, even the ruling class.<\/p>\n

There were three major contributing factors to the prevalence of political assassination in Ancient Rome. Firstly, there was the nature of Roman politics which was highly competitive and, at times, brutal. Political rivals could be seen as legitimate targets, particularly those in the senatorial class. Secondly, the Roman legal system and its ability to protect important individuals from prosecution – or even think of them as innocent until proved guilty – was greatly limited during this period, meaning that those accused of political crimes had few options for defending their physical safety. Finally, the Roman attitude towards assassination as an acceptable means of obtaining power meant that it was seen as a legitimate form of political action.<\/p>\n

The Roman political system was highly competitive, with individuals vying for power and influence. Elections were a key feature of Roman politics and there was a real fear of being eclipsed by a political rival. This fear may have contributed to the prevalence of political assassination, as a means to remove a potential threat to one’s own power base. As the Roman historian Tacitus noted, “the highest offices of state are obtained by force and violence, not by free and fair elections.”<\/p>\n

The Roman legal system was also highly imperfect. Laws were applied unevenly and justice was often difficult to attain. This was particularly true for those accused of political crimes, meaning that physical protection was not always easily available to those who needed it. This made assassination a handy alternative for those looking to remove political rivals, with few repercussions.<\/p>\n