{"id":10199,"date":"2023-11-21T23:45:17","date_gmt":"2023-11-21T22:45:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/?p=10199"},"modified":"2023-11-21T23:45:17","modified_gmt":"2023-11-21T22:45:17","slug":"why-is-ancient-rome-geographic-dystopian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.learnancientrome.com\/why-is-ancient-rome-geographic-dystopian\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Is Ancient Rome Geographic Dystopian"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Most people who lived during the Roman Empire were familiar with its imperial grandeur and legendary empire. If we look closer into the empire and its structures, it is evident that this region is an example of a geographical dystopian state. Specifically, ancient Rome’s location, climate and class structure all worked together to create a state of almost total oppression. This is why when people talk about a dystopian society, Rome is the first place to come to mind.<\/p>\n

Geographically speaking, Rome was built upon seven hills, near the centre of the Italian peninsula. This area was not naturally rich in resources and was highly exposed to external threats and unpredictable weather conditions. These geographic features meant that the Romans had to capitalize on their military and political advantages in order to sustain the city. They had to take action by developing complex hydraulic engineering systems as well as early aqueducts to maintain the city’s growth and prosperity. As a result, the Roman state became extremely authoritarian, with a ruler who possessed considerable powers over the population.<\/p>\n

In an effort to maintain control, the Romans entrenched a system of social stratification. This structure divided the populace into different classes with different levels of rights and privileges. The wealthy Patricians, who were the ruling class, represented the elite few who lived lavishly while the Plebeians, who made up the masses, worked hard yet lived in poverty. This ironclad system of social hierarchy meant that power remained firmly in the hands of the aristocracy. Furthermore, the lower class was powerless to oppose the authority of their superiors and the Emperor was an almost untouchable figure.<\/p>\n

The control of the Roman Empire was also maintained through strict enforcement of laws and a highly centralized government. It was rare for anyone to challenge the government and any dissent was met with harsh punishments. As part of this heavy-handed approach, the Romans adopted a large network of surveillance and repression techniques to keep their subjects in check. This widespread censorship of speech and thought meant that Rome conformed closely to the definition of a dystopian state.<\/p>\n